Author: Kirill Kryukov
Date: 08:16:43 02/25/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2006 at 08:55:31, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >Yes, without a doubt you show nothing special in your move-to-move comparison. >And you conclude that then nothin could be in common. My argument is different, >Kirill. I say that Rybka is a follow-up for tournaments in special against other >computers. You can well describe it with the essence of chess itself. Chess isnt >solved and thereforse? Think for yourself. Rybka plays moves others dont even >expect and this is the difference in strength. And now it's a continual race >between the chasing progs and the chased Rybka. Fritz doesnt need to compete in >such a race. But still has the same overall power after now thousands of games >against other progs. You cant "see" this with your calculations. I already said >that your work is valuable. But it doent show everything. (I'm also writing >this for history. In months members could re-read what has been said and at what >stage. Interesting topic.) -Rolf Rolf, any discussion is meaningless when you don't show your results.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.