Author: Tony Thomas Karippa
Date: 18:33:17 02/25/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2006 at 21:20:15, Tony Thomas Karippa wrote: >On February 25, 2006 at 19:20:36, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 25, 2006 at 18:51:15, Tony Thomas Karippa wrote: >> >>>On February 25, 2006 at 18:22:19, George Tsavdaris wrote: >>> >>>>On February 25, 2006 at 18:14:20, Tony Thomas Karippa wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 25, 2006 at 17:50:25, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 25, 2006 at 17:25:05, Tony Thomas Karippa wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Why are you so surprises? Yes, I know it was a connection problem, but Zappa >>>>>>>isnt weaker than fruit, at least not when running on a quad. >>>>>> >>>>>>We do not know it because nobody can test zappa on a quad against latest fruit. >>>>>> >>>>>>Uri >>>>>Didnt Zappa ran on a quad in WCCC 2005 and in Leiden?? >>>> >>>>Do you call one game against Fruit testing......? >>>>Also that Fruit played there, was not the latest.... >>>Dont bring that argument, Zappa wasnt the latest either. >> >>It is another reason that we cannot compare the levels between zappa and fruit. >>It is possible that previous zappa is better than fruit but latest zappa is >>weaker than fruit. >> >> The last three times >>>they played against each other Zappa one twice and draw one game. Isnt that >>>clear evidence that they are on the same level to say the least. >> >>No >>player a1 beated player b1 >>player a2 beated player b2 >>player a3 drew with player b3 >> >>Is it an evidecne that player a4 is at least in the same level as player b4? >>No. >> >>We simply do not know. >>We did not claim that zappa is weaker than fruit and of course we have no >>evidence for that. >> >>You claimed that zappa ia not weaker than fruit and we criticized this claim >>because you also have no evidence for that. >> >>Uri >No no no, that isnt the case >1)player a1 defeated player b1 >2)player a1 defeated player b1 >3)the next game was a draw >I dont see why you are using different names for the same engines(Based on >versions?) >To me its enough evidence to say that they are within the same elo range. When >was the last time Fruit won a major tournament?? Have you seen the elo list >posted by Jouni Uski?? It indicated that Zappa is one of the top engines. Also >Zappa has the advantage of the hardware. In case you missed it here is the link http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?488168 I heard that the new Movei is stronger than Fruit, when do we get to test it?? :-) :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.