Author: J.Dufek
Date: 00:22:38 02/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2006 at 18:04:23, Tansel Turgut wrote: >On February 25, 2006 at 16:47:04, J.Dufek wrote: > >.... Once more. Infinite analysis is only _SMALL PART_ CC games . Ignoring this >>fact you cannot go up with results and ELO. Fruit's playing style is not very >>suitable for sharp CC games. Rybka in this moment /short analysis line/ is >>useless for CC. > > >Thanks J,thanks Uri... > > >1) J, I didn't understand why you think Rybka is not good for cc? Short PV. Uri's post is right > >2) ( short analysis line?- what exactly do you mean?)it should analyze deep >enough if enough time given. look 1) > >3)Do you guys use DPA? I just started looking at it. I don't know how reliable >it is. But I know that Kenneth Frey is using it alot and he has been very >succesfull. > DPA is one from automatic analysis feature. ChessAssistan offers autom. analysis too, but too sophisticated and complicated. >best regards, >Tansel In reallity difference between few bests moves /maybe better: moves-candidates/ is only few centipawns. Hardly engine can understand positions, when does't know more about next moves. DPA evalute end position after few moves - you get more relevant results than with using infinite analysis. Probably not only Keenet use for DPA more than 1PC. This analysis "cycle" need very often few days works of 1 PC...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.