Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:51:37 02/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2006 at 12:12:25, Tony Thomas Karippa wrote: >Dont you see that it was always the same folks complaing about Rolf? this is not true. the people are always different people. no frickenschmidt, no moritz berger, no gillgasch, no herttrich, no whatever anymore. the people who complained this time were not involved in the case 1996 in RGCC. but the reason for THEIR complains is the same: RT. >I disagree, how can just one man destroy a whole forum, unless of course he was >the owner. read with google in older newsgroups. >I think it's part of your anti-rolf propaganda. i was not involved in rolfs banning and did not complain lately. but i do subscribe these actions. there is no anti-rolf propaganda. there is only what the internet shows you when you google about those old days. >I dont judge people by what they did in the past. what rolf did 1996 and his behaviour today is exactly the same. he has not changed. so it makes no difference which time you judge. i do judge people by what they do. if they behave nasty, i do not close my eyes about it. if a guest on my birthday party behaves nasty, i maybe tolerate it 1 or 2 times. but next birtday party i will not tolerate him. and next time, i do not invite him. this is what happens with rolf. he had many chances. he could have behaved normal. but he did not. he attacked rybka people for no reason. he tried to avoke chaos and anger. mainly he tried to split the group and to increase hate and anger. if you study the archives then you will see that THIS is exactly the behaviour he splitted and destroyed discussions in rgcc in 1996 and the following years. since rgcc was not moderated, it was not possible to stop him. this forum is moderated. and therefore it IS possible to stop him. but it took IMO too long to do it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.