Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:09:24 02/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2006 at 23:57:28, Uri Blass wrote:
>On February 26, 2006 at 23:50:57, Peter Skinner wrote:
>
>>On February 26, 2006 at 23:16:54, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>In the pgn of CCT I find no moves.
>>>
>>>Note that I read that fruit lost against zappa by that way but I did not read
>>>about something strange in the game fruit-hiarcs in this forum.
>>>
>>>I also see no moves in zappa-fruit and I guess it cannot be correct because
>>>zappa did play first move as white.
>>
>>Fruit also lost by forfeit to Hiarcs.
>>
>>[Event "ICC 50 3 u"]
>>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>>[Date "2006.02.26"]
>>[Round "-"]
>>[White "FruitCCT8"]
>>[Black "Hiarcs8x"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[ICCResult "Game set by TD"]
>>[WhiteElo "2000"]
>>[BlackElo "2812"]
>>[Opening "QGD: Tartakower (Makagonov-Bondarevsky) system"]
>>[ECO "D58"]
>>[NIC "QO.10"]
>>[Time "11:00:37"]
>>[TimeControl "3000+3"]
>>
>>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. Nc3 Be7 5. Bg5 h6 6. Bh4 O-O 7. e3 b6 8. Be2
>>Bb7 9. Rc1 Nbd7 10. cxd5 exd5 11. O-O c5 12. Qa4 a6 13. dxc5 bxc5 14. Rfd1
>>Bd6 15. Nxd5 Bxd5 {Game set by TD} 0-1
>
>Thanks
>
>I wonder what is the reason in that time.
>I guess it was again some external factor and not bug in the engine.
>
>It seems that fruit lost only one game not by some external factors like
>interface and it was against spike when it was very unlucky
>
>As you can see even rybka see nothing here but it seems that black is in serious
>trouble here based on analysis.
>
>Spike - Fruit, ICC 50 3 u Internet Chess Club 2006
>[D]r4rk1/1b4pp/p2P4/4np2/Ppp4q/4B2P/1PBQ2P1/R4RK1 b - - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Rybka 1.01 Beta 13d 32-bit:
>
>25...Be4
> = (0.20) Depth: 3 00:00:00
>25...Nd3
> = (0.08) Depth: 3 00:00:00
>25...Nd3
> ² (0.26) Depth: 4 00:00:00
>25...Nd3 26.Bxd3
> = (0.08) Depth: 5 00:00:00
>25...Nd3 26.Bxd3 cxd3 27.Qxd3 Qg3
> ² (0.42) Depth: 6 00:00:00 16kN
>25...Be4 26.Bf2 Qh6
> = (0.00) Depth: 6 00:00:00 20kN
>25...Be4 26.Bf2 Qh6 27.Be3
> = (0.00) Depth: 7 00:00:00 33kN
>25...Be4 26.Bg5 c3 27.Bxh4 cxd2 28.Bb3+ Kh8
> ± (0.71) Depth: 8 00:00:01 70kN
>25...Nd3 26.Bxd3 cxd3 27.Qxd3 Qg3 28.Rf2 Rad8
> ² (0.57) Depth: 8 00:00:01 97kN
>25...c3 26.bxc3 bxc3 27.Qxc3 Qg3 28.Bb3+ Kh8 29.Ra2
> = (0.03) Depth: 8 00:00:02 125kN
>25...c3 26.bxc3 bxc3 27.Qxc3 Qg3 28.Bb3+ Kh8 29.Ra2 Rac8
> = (0.03) Depth: 9 00:00:04 212kN
>25...c3 26.bxc3 bxc3 27.Qxc3 Qg3 28.Bb3+ Kh8 29.Ra2 Rab8 30.Raf2
> = (0.13) Depth: 10 00:00:07 402kN
>25...c3 26.bxc3 bxc3 27.Qe1 Qxe1 28.Rfxe1 Be4 29.Bd4 Nf7 30.Bxe4
> = (0.19) Depth: 11 00:00:17 956kN
>25...c3 26.bxc3 bxc3 27.Qe1 Qxe1 28.Rfxe1 Be4 29.Bd4 Bxc2 30.Bxe5 Rac8
> ² (0.39) Depth: 12 00:00:35 1957kN
>25...c3 26.bxc3 bxc3 27.Qe1 Qxe1 28.Rfxe1 Be4 29.Bd4 Bxc2 30.Bxe5 Rac8 31.Rec1
> = (0.20) Depth: 13 00:01:36 5297kN
>25...c3 26.bxc3 bxc3 27.Qe1 Qxe1 28.Rfxe1 Be4 29.Bd4 Bxc2 30.Bxe5 Rac8 31.Rec1
>Be4
> ² (0.34) Depth: 14 00:02:33 8696kN
>25...c3 26.bxc3 bxc3 27.Qe1 Qxe1 28.Rfxe1 Be4 29.Bd4 Nf7 30.Bxe4 fxe4 31.d7 Rfd8
>32.Rxe4
> = (0.21) Depth: 15 00:07:21 24492kN
>25...c3 26.bxc3 bxc3 27.Qe1 Qxe1 28.Rfxe1 Be4 29.Bd4 Nf7 30.Bxe4 fxe4 31.d7 Rfd8
>32.Rxe4
> = (0.21) Depth: 16 00:12:17 40710kN
>
>(, 27.02.2006)
I mean that after 25...c3 black has serious problems.
Maybe black has good alternative to 25...c3 and I did not check it but every
alternative later is evaluated by rybka as significant advantage for white so it
is possible that the losing mistake is very deep to find.
Maybe 27...Qf6 is an improvement but I am not sure about it.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.