Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 01:16:17 02/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2006 at 20:02:47, Tony Thomas Karippa wrote: >Rather unsatisfying results for Glaurung(I expected better), Yes, the results were not that great - but I'm still very satisfied. I am more interested in finding evaluation weaknesses than in winning games, and from this point of view the tournament was a great success! I was also happy to see that I didn't lose a single game because of tactical mistakes. When using two CPUs, Glaurung is finally fast enough to avoid being outsearched by everybody else. >but it sure did a lot better in blitz. Yes, clear second place behind Hiarcs in the blitz in front of Rybka, Fruit, Junior and Spike was of course a fantastic result. I really didn't expect that after scoring 1/3 in the first three rounds. :-) I still think Glaurung is better in slow games, though. It was just slightly unlucky in the main tournament, and extremely lucky in the blitz. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.