Author: Tony Thomas Karippa
Date: 01:28:25 02/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2006 at 04:16:17, Tord Romstad wrote: >On February 26, 2006 at 20:02:47, Tony Thomas Karippa wrote: > >>Rather unsatisfying results for Glaurung(I expected better), > >Yes, the results were not that great - but I'm still very satisfied. I >am more interested in finding evaluation weaknesses than in winning >games, and from this point of view the tournament was a great >success! I was also happy to see that I didn't lose a single game >because of tactical mistakes. When using two CPUs, Glaurung is >finally fast enough to avoid being outsearched by everybody else. > >>but it sure did a lot better in blitz. > >Yes, clear second place behind Hiarcs in the blitz in front of Rybka, >Fruit, Junior and Spike was of course a fantastic result. I really >didn't expect that after scoring 1/3 in the first three rounds. :-) > >I still think Glaurung is better in slow games, though. It was just >slightly unlucky in the main tournament, and extremely lucky in >the blitz. > >Tord Tord now you need a break, you have been working too hard:-) I do not play long time control games, way too boring for my taste, but Glaurung sure does very well on my computer in blitz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.