Author: Charles L. Williams
Date: 20:11:22 04/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 1999 at 19:43:47, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On April 16, 1999 at 19:06:51, William Dozier wrote: > >>Good/day every/one: This pretains to the whole game of chess/the end/game is the >>bottom/line who wins and loses; and there is a lot of variables in/between the >>beginig and the end game. Basically the whole/game of chess is geomerty in >>motion. All the pieces on the board are dictated to move at a angle/for example >>the knight moves in a 90 degree angle anywhere on the board/no other piece on >>the board make a 90 degree angle move, and so on for the rest of the pieces. I >>mean to say that all the other pieces have dictated angles and there degrees. >>Its possable that you can translated it into chess/code. Possabley it would be >>another/way to write chess/programs-To make a better mouse trap. What do you >>guys think?/Respectfully/William > >Mine plays on a 1 x 64 strip of squares. > >bruce I love it. A Turing Machine. :) Seriously, maybe math is a good idea to explore. Maybe we just don't have the right math yet. After all, Newton invented/discovered calculus to fill a need. Chuck
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.