Author: Graham Banks
Date: 09:52:52 02/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2006 at 12:45:31, Graham Banks wrote: >On February 27, 2006 at 09:48:00, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On February 27, 2006 at 09:35:41, Fernando Villegas wrote: >> >>>I wonder if it is OK someone must be banned because the number of complains and >>>NOt because trespassing the rules. Justice is based in rules, not in opinions. >>>Only exception: Athenes and the exiling method, ostracism. >>>Are we giving new life to that proceeding? >>> >>>Fernando >> >>Please read the thread more carefully. He was neither banned because of the >>number of complaints, nor because of the complaints at all. >>He was obviously just banned for perpetuating nonsense. >> >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?489769 >> >>Guenther > > >Hi Fernando, > >Guenther is correct. Perhaps I should have expanded more. A member doesn't get >banned purely because of complaints. > >Regards, Graham. One of the reasons that members were notified of the ban was because of the many complaints over a long period of time. That was in essence what I was trying to say, but many read that I was giving that as the reason for the ban. This was not the case. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.