Author: Mark Young
Date: 22:25:24 04/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 1999 at 23:01:40, Steve wrote: >I'm a bit puzzled. Doesn't "positional understanding" require the ability to >conceptualize, meaning that no existing programs -- no matter how strong -- can >really have any "positional understanding?" Or has the art advanced beyond >that? Forget what you have heard from chess players and most book about "positional understanding" Then ask yourself what is "positional understanding"? You know your have the right answer when you figure out that a program does not have to conceptualize to have "positional understanding"
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.