Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What do mean these Fruit losses ?

Author: Ryan B.

Date: 12:53:18 02/27/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 27, 2006 at 14:37:15, Robert Allgeuer wrote:

>On February 27, 2006 at 08:21:20, Joachim Rang wrote:
>
>>On February 27, 2006 at 04:15:39, Marc Lacrosse wrote:
>>
>>>On February 27, 2006 at 00:46:35, Ryan B. wrote:
>>>
>>
>>Hi Marc,
>>
>>I will make a statement here. ;-) In fact at the moment Ryan is the one who
>>keeps the ball rolling. Fabien has not worked on Fruit since December 2005 due
>>to other obligations he has. I hope he will soon continue with the
>>SMP-Implementation which he started autumn last year. I am currently writing my
>>diploma thesis and have no time either. Ryan is busy on improving Fruit together
>>with some stout-hearted testers and volunteered to participate in CCT8. In fact
>>he is currently the driving force behind the development of Fruit but I hope not
>>alone since at least I respond to his emails in time. Fruit never intended to be
>>a competition engine like Crafty and Zappa so we participate in the tournements
>>with olympic spirit. As for Torino we'll see.
>>
>>regards
>>Joachim
>
>
>Joachim,
>does this mean that GambitFruit is dead or that GambitFruit and Fruit will be
>merged?
>
>Thanks
>Robert


To keep the code clean (and there would be licensing issues anyway) Fruit uses
no code from Gambit Fruit in its exact form.  This is not to say ideas from
Gambit Fruit or other engines will not have some influence in Fruit.  I will
likely include a setting in the next fruit to play a more aggressive gambit
style for people who enjoy that style of game and are willing to give up a few
elo in computer vs computer matches to have something that is fun and exciting
to play against.

Ryan



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.