Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Tactics

Author: Frank Phillips

Date: 07:38:25 04/17/99


There are times when I think my chess program is actually working.  This is one
such moment.  It is hardly a killer, but manages around 260 on WAC300 at 10
seconds a move and is about on a par with GNUChess4 in matches under WinBoard -
which, as I recall, according to at least one authority here puts it firmly in
the pansy class.  (Come to think of it I need to name it.).   Against LambChop
and Gromit, for example, however it often falls to tactics even though, at least
in the case of LambChop according to its readme files, these programs are not
necessarily faster searches.  So my question is, how do you make a program a
better tactician?  Currently mine is the usual mix of full-width alpha-beta
(PVS) search with extensions for check, recapture and pawn-push in the endgame
in the endgame, and simple quiescent alpha-beta with futility pruning.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.