Author: Salvador H Cresce
Date: 10:14:31 02/28/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2006 at 12:54:20, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 28, 2006 at 11:09:32, Majd Al-Ansari wrote: > >>Letting Rybka use an optimized book is almost not fair for other programs. > >Rybka cannot use that book not under chessbase so I consider it as not part of >rybka'a package. > >I think that the ssdf should not use it in their testing of rybka when they test >rybka because they should test commercial products and the combination between >.ctg book and rybka is combination of 2 commercial products. > >I am lucky to have Fritz8 and Junior9 as chessbase engines but I simply do not >care about book today and I am not going to use it. > ><snipped> >> Rybka was already beating any engine with its own native book very >>handily, so now I guess things will really get ugly. They might get even uglier >>once the last few weaknesses of Rybka are covered (endgame knowledge). > >You are wrong if you think that lack of some endgame knowledge is the only >weakness of Rybka. > >based on my experience in correspondence games it has more weaknesses. > >Uri What are the weaknesses you found on correspondence games? Where do you play correspondence games? I play on ICCF. Salvador
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.