Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:56:42 02/28/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2006 at 14:19:37, Paulo Cesar Soares wrote: <snipped> >>I am afraid that I am going to lose at least one game because of the weaknesses >>of chess programs but generally they are more productive than counter productive >>and I believe that I could score less without trusting them and only using them >>for blunder check. >> >>Uri > >I believe that there are cases in that two or until more moves should be >analyzed with depth, that suggests that little times I believe in the analysis >of the computer. I do not understand part of this sentence. I agree that more than one move should be analyzed and a big part of the computer analysis that I do is in 2 option mode or 3 option mode. I do not understand "that suggests that little times I believe in the analysis of the computer". Of course with more time you can analyze bigger trees but when there is a sequence of 2 moves that are not suggested by computers as first choice then it is natural not to give long analysis for what happens after them and in one of the game my opponent did exactly that. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.