Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New Rybka book in test: STUNNING

Author: Salvador H Cresce

Date: 13:45:00 02/28/06

Go up one level in this thread


On February 28, 2006 at 14:56:42, Uri Blass wrote:

>On February 28, 2006 at 14:19:37, Paulo Cesar Soares wrote:
>
>
><snipped>
>>>I am afraid that I am going to lose at least one game because of the weaknesses
>>>of chess programs but generally they are more productive than counter productive
>>>and I believe that I could score less without trusting them and only using them
>>>for blunder check.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>I believe that there are cases in that two or until more moves should be
>>analyzed with depth, that suggests that little times I believe in the analysis
>>of the computer.
>
>I do not understand part of this sentence.
>
>I agree that more than one move should be analyzed and a big part of the
>computer analysis that I do is in 2 option mode or 3 option mode.
>
>I do not understand
>"that suggests that little times I believe in the analysis
>of the computer".
>
>Of course with more time you can analyze bigger trees but when there is a
>sequence of 2 moves that are not suggested by computers as first choice then it
>is natural not to give long analysis for what happens after them and in one of
>the game my opponent did exactly that.
>
>Uri

Uri, I am curious to see your ICCF games still playing. Could you send them to
me at scresce@terra.com.br.

Salvador



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.