Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 15:55:29 02/28/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2006 at 18:35:13, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On February 28, 2006 at 17:33:41, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >>In the following position >>q3nrk1/4bppp/3p4/r3nPP1/4P2P/NpQ1B3/1P4B1/1K1R3R b >>Three different versions of Chessmaster find this move at progressively deeper >>and deeper plys : CM 8000 at ply 13 ;CM 9000 at ply 14 and CM 10th edition at >>ply 15.This is by no means unique as it seems that in a lot of difficult tacital >>positions the later versions of Chessmaster find the key moves later! > > Instead of waiting 3 hours you can use my personality that is indended to play >attacking Chess and it does! It can find the move in around 8 minutes! > Also i don't think what you say it's true generally since the later Chessmaster >versions are stronger than their predecessors so it is logical to find the moves >earlier..... > >Analysis by "The King 3.33 Attacker" personality: > >1...Ra5-a4 2.f5-f6 Be7xf6 3.g5xf6 Ne8xf6 4.Rd1xd6 > +- (1.68) Depth: 4 00:00:07 >1...h7-h6 2.Qc3xb3 Ne8-c7 3.Be3-b6 > +- (1.63) Depth: 4 00:00:07 >1...Ra5xa3 2.b2xa3 Qa8xa3 3.Rd1-d2 Be7-d8 4.Rh1-d1 > +- (1.50) Depth: 4 00:00:07 >1...Ra5xa3 2.b2xa3 Qa8xa3 3.Rd1-d2 Be7-d8 4.Rd2-b2 Qa3-a6 5.Qc3xb3 > +- (1.78) Depth: 5 00:00:07 >1...h7-h6 2.Qc3-b4 Ra5-a4 3.Qb4xb3 Ne8-c7 > ± (1.36) Depth: 5 00:00:07 >1...h7-h6 2.Qc3-b4 h6xg5 3.h4xg5 Ne8-c7 4.Qb4xb3 > +- (1.61) Depth: 6 00:00:08 78kN >1...Qa8-a6 2.Rh1-e1 Ne5-c4 3.Qc3xc4 Ra5xa3 4.Qc4xa6 Ra3xa6 > +- (1.49) Depth: 6 00:00:08 95kN >1...Ra5-a4 2.Qc3xb3 Ne8-c7 3.Be3-b6 Rf8-b8 4.Rd1-c1 > +- (1.42) Depth: 6 00:00:08 115kN >1...Ra5-a4 2.f5-f6 g7xf6 3.Qc3xb3 f6xg5 4.h4xg5 Ne8-c7 > ± (1.26) Depth: 7 00:00:08 277kN >1...Ra5-a4 2.Rh1-h3 Qa8-b7 3.Be3-d4 Ne5-c6 4.Bd4-f2 d6-d5 5.Rd1xd5 Be7xa3 >6.b2xa3 Ra4xa3 > ± (1.22) Depth: 8 00:00:08 938kN >1...Ra5-a6 2.Rh1-h3 Qa8-b7 3.Be3-f4 Ne8-c7 4.f5-f6 g7xf6 5.Qc3xb3 Qb7xb3 >6.Rh3xb3 f6xg5 7.h4xg5 > ± (1.17) Depth: 8 00:00:08 1125kN >1...Ra5-a6 2.Be3-d4 Qa8-b7 3.Rh1-h3 Ne8-c7 4.Qc3xb3 Rf8-b8 5.Qb3xb7 Rb8xb7 >6.Bg2-f1 > ± (1.14) Depth: 9 00:00:08 2413kN >1...Ra5-a6 2.Rd1-d4 Be7-d8 3.Be3-f4 Qa8-b7 4.Rd4-b4 Ra6-b6 5.Rb4xb6 Qb7xb6 >6.Bf4xe5 d6xe5 7.Qc3xe5 > ± (1.04) Depth: 10 00:00:19 6891kN >1...Ra5-a6 2.Be3-d4 Qa8-b7 3.Rh1-h3 Ne8-c7 4.Rd1-c1 Ra6-c6 5.Qc3xb3 Rc6xc1+ >6.Kb1xc1 Rf8-b8 7.Qb3xb7 Rb8xb7 > ± (1.11) Depth: 11 00:00:51 17867kN >1...Ne8-f6 2.g5xf6 Be7xf6 3.Qc3xb3 Rf8-b8 4.Be3-b6 Qa8-c6 5.Rd1-c1 Ra5xa3 >6.b2xa3 Rb8xb6 7.Rc1xc6 Rb6xb3+ 8.Kb1-c2 > ± (1.05) Depth: 11 00:01:59 42002kN >1...Ne8-f6 2.g5xf6 Be7xf6 3.Rh1-g1 Ra5xa3 4.b2xa3 Qa8xa3 5.Qc3-a1 Qa3xa1+ >6.Kb1xa1 Rf8-a8+ 7.Ka1-b2 Ne5-c4+ 8.Kb2xb3 Nc4xe3 9.Rd1xd6 Ra8-b8+ 10.Kb3-a4 >Bf6xh4 > ² (0.70) Depth: 12 00:02:40 57401kN >1...Ne8-f6 2.g5xf6 Be7xf6 3.Be3-g5 Rf8-c8 4.Qc3-b4 Bf6xg5 5.h4xg5 Ne5-c4 >6.Rd1-c1 Ra5-a4 7.Rc1xc4 Ra4xb4 8.Rc4xb4 h7-h6 9.Rb4xb3 h6xg5 > ² (0.69) Depth: 13 00:04:43 109774kN >1...Ne8-c7 2.Qc3xc7 Rf8-c8 3.Qc7xe7 Ne5-c4 4.Rd1xd6 Ra5xa3 5.b2xa3 Nc4xa3+ >6.Kb1-b2 Na3-c4+ 7.Kb2-c3 Nc4xd6+ 8.Kc3-d4 Qa8-a4+ 9.Kd4-e5 Rc8-e8 10.Ke5xd6 >Re8xe7 11.Kd6xe7 > ² (0.63) Depth: 13 00:07:43 200247kN >1...Ne8-c7 2.Qc3xc7 Rf8-c8 3.Qc7xe7 Ne5-c4 4.g5-g6 h7xg6 5.Be3-d4 Qa8-c6 >6.Kb1-c1 Nc4xa3+ 7.Bd4-c3 Na3-b5 8.Rd1-d5 Ra5-a1+ 9.Kc1-d2 Ra1xh1 10.Rd5xb5 > ² (0.33) Depth: 14 00:14:39 381436kN I know very little of the personalities that you have created ;But if you use the default personalities of CM 8000 CM 9000 and CM 10 Edition you will notice that what I have said is true in this position and many others.Note that being tactically weaker does not mean being weaker overall;and knowing Johan de Konings superb programming skills; CM 10th Edition is probably the strongest CM to date.But search Extensions in CM 10th are rather different than previous Editions.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.