Author: Paulo Cesar Soares
Date: 20:37:53 02/28/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2006 at 16:48:45, Salvador H Cresce wrote: >On February 28, 2006 at 15:24:04, Paulo Cesar Soares wrote: > >>On February 28, 2006 at 14:56:42, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 28, 2006 at 14:19:37, Paulo Cesar Soares wrote: >>> >>> >>><snipped> >>>>>I am afraid that I am going to lose at least one game because of the weaknesses >>>>>of chess programs but generally they are more productive than counter productive >>>>>and I believe that I could score less without trusting them and only using them >>>>>for blunder check. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>I believe that there are cases in that two or until more moves should be >>>>analyzed with depth, that suggests that little times I believe in the analysis >>>>of the computer. >>> >>>I do not understand part of this sentence. >>> >>>I agree that more than one move should be analyzed and a big part of the >>>computer analysis that I do is in 2 option mode or 3 option mode. >>> >>>I do not understand >>>"that suggests that little times I believe in the analysis >>>of the computer". >>> >>>Of course with more time you can analyze bigger trees but when there is a >>>sequence of 2 moves that are not suggested by computers as first choice then it >>>is natural not to give long analysis for what happens after them and in one of >>>the game my opponent did exactly that. >>> >>>Uri >> >>"that suggests that little times I believe in the analysis >>of the computer", means that I don´t believe in computers >>in one option move analysis mode in depth analysis. >> >>I place the program initially in 2 or 3 positions, as you, but that >>can change in agreement with the evaluation that it gives. For some positions >>I can decrease, and for other, to increase the number of moves. If I have time >>to analyze the positions, I sometimes analyze more >>than three moves forcing the computer to play the moves, and then I have >>a large tree. >> >>Paulo Soares > >Paulo, are you using Rybka 13d? >If you wish we can discuss about strategies for long time analysis. >My email is: scresce@terra.com.br > >Salvador Yes, Salvador, I am trying Rybka for depth analyses. I thank your invitation, but my wife won't agree. =) When I abandoned the semifinal of the Brazilian championship, I was well, and I could be classified, besides I had a good position in a game against Zélio, that ended up being the Brazilian champion. But I had to opt, or I continued married or I played postal chess. =) I preferred to continue married and, sometimes, I am devoted to the chess with more frequency. Paulo Soares
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.