Author: Andrew Walker
Date: 21:10:42 02/28/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2006 at 18:57:10, Bahram Namjou wrote: >On February 27, 2006 at 14:24:22, Harvey Williamson wrote: > >>On February 27, 2006 at 02:39:32, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On February 26, 2006 at 18:34:03, Bahram Namjou wrote: >>> >>>>thanks, bn >>> >>> >>> 180-200 Elo >>> Best regards >>> Kurt >> >> >>Hi, >> >>Hiarcs8X is the name of the login at ICC and not the engine. I think Kurt is >>refering to the 180-200 points that Hiarcs10 is stronger than Hiarcs8. It would >>be nice if the version that we played with was 180-200 points stronger than H10 >>then we would be be well ahead of Rybka - a nice thought! >> >>Best Wishes >> >>Harvey > >Hi Harvey: the problem is H10 doesn't like some of your moves in CCT8 and my pc >is fast enough so i was wondering what kind of version of Hiarcs you used >...Also if that version be available to public for free so we can have some >better competetive plays against rybka in playchess!...thanks, bn It would be better if you could post an example search and give hash size and cpu speed. Evene if they were using the same engine version, the facts they probably had a different hash size and were pondering from previous moves will already produce differences. Some moves found in games can take a lot longer to find from scratch! For instance, in engine-engine games you will often see mate announcements after only a few seconds. However if you then set it up and try to solve it, it may take a lot longer. Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.