Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 04:34:57 03/01/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2006 at 09:09:00, Tord Romstad wrote: >On February 28, 2006 at 08:52:53, Kenny Dail wrote: > >>Is this better than the: >> Glaurung 0.1.5 ---> Glaurung Mainz ---> Glaurung 1.0.2 ---> Glaurung CCT8 >>naming convention? I may get confused as to which one is current. :) > >That's hardly the same thing, but I get your point. I suppose the easiest >rule is simply that the current version is always the one which is available >from my Web site. > >Besides, it wouldn't have looked quite as bad if you had included all >the public versions in your list. :-) > >Glaurung 0.1.2 -> Glaurung 0.1.3 -> Glaurung 0.1.4 -> Glaurung 0.1.5 -> >Glaurung 0.1.6 -> Glaurung 0.2.0 -> Glaurung 0.2.1 -> Glaurung 0.2.3 -> >Glaurung 0.2.4 -> Glaurung Mainz -> Glaurung 1.0 -> Glaurung 1.0.1 -> >Glaurung 1.0.2 -> Glaurung CCT8. > >Except for Glaurung Mainz and Glaurung CCT8 it isn't that bad, is it? :-) >And Glaurung CCT8 will not be usable at all except for those few people >who has a dual, of course. For most practical purposes, Glaurung 1.0.2 >is still the current version, and will remain so for some time. > >Tord I downloaded Glaurung CCT8, changed number of threads to 1 and it runs perfectly on a one CPU machine. great program takk for dette meget sterke sjakk program Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.