Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:00:25 03/01/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 01, 2006 at 07:34:15, horst meyer wrote: >you have more experience in corr. chess than me, so u r surely right. but if a >player who doesn't perfectly know - that means better than his computer - what >is going on in his games, achieves a rating of 2400 or 2500, then the niveau is >rather weak in my opinion. my experience in corr. chess consists of only 52 >games. I stopped because it was too much work and too less "play". but I played >against 3 otb IM and 2 corresspondece chess GM and didn't lose any of the 52 >games. my impression was, that all the players who mainly made computer moves >had no chance at all. maybe this has changed over the last 3 years!? I think that it is dependent on the time that you give the computer. rely mainly on the computer also does not mean choosing automatically move that the best program suggest and you need to decide what is the program that you believe to in most cases. I remember a case some years ago when I decided not to believe deep fritz6 and gandalf4.32 suggested a better move. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.