Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Conversion utilities is a much better idea

Author: Marc Lacrosse

Date: 22:15:50 03/03/06

Go up one level in this thread


On March 03, 2006 at 16:53:53, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On March 03, 2006 at 16:44:19, Majd Al-Ansari wrote:
>
>>I think making utilities that will convert a book from one format to another is
>>probably a better idea.

(...)

>
>The professional book builders do not want that to happen.  I predict that it
>will not.
>
>If it is possible to export an opening book from (for instance) ChessBase, they
>would be crazy not to strip out their intense labors so that some competitors
>could just take their body of work.

I cannot see the point Dann .

In its present state, chessbase .ctg format lets anybody browse the content of
the book : I can take Jeroen's new book for Rybka ans see all his choices
regarding lines to be played or to be avoided. So I can copy all his ideas if I
wish.

A very important point is the fact that I can see wether a book move is played
because of underlying base statistics or because of the book-cooker manual
choices.

I just cannot mechanically translate the whole book in another format.

What I wish would be just the opposite :
a double format including a hidden content version for "professional" books and
a general one well-documented version with tools for conversion from and to most
proprietary formats.


Marc



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.