Author: James Constance
Date: 23:25:34 03/03/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2006 at 16:37:29, James T. Walker wrote: >On March 03, 2006 at 16:30:23, James Constance wrote: > >>On March 03, 2006 at 13:20:06, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>It's a tablebase draw. >> >>Yes, that was the point! And yet engines evaluate it as a winning position. > >After 3 hours Shredder 9UCI was about +4.49 and 48 ply. :-) >Jim Yeah, it would be amusing if it wasn't a part of my analysis for a correspondence game! I had initially ignored analyzing further down the line which led to this position because of the high engine evaluation - previously I had thought that with Fritz9 and RPP-RP endings a +3 was a certain win. Just goes to show, you can never be too sure with rook and pawn endings! Now I've got a lot of work to do to try and find a win in my current position!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.