Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is Suffle Chess Better Than FRC For Testing Engines?

Author: Reinhard Scharnagl

Date: 03:29:33 03/04/06

Go up one level in this thread


On March 04, 2006 at 06:24:26, Tord Romstad wrote:

>On March 04, 2006 at 05:57:01, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote:
>
>>On March 04, 2006 at 05:28:49, Tord Romstad wrote:
>>
>>>On March 03, 2006 at 23:44:04, Swaminathan wrote:
>>>
>>>>I wonder what exactly is wrong with shuffle chess?
>>>
>>>Nothing.  And shuffle chess is not better (nor worse) than FRC
>>>for testing engines.  They are simply two slightly different games,
>>>and which game you prefer is a matter of taste.
>>
>>Veto! Of course Chess960 is a compatible superset to traditional chess.
>>Any Chess960 aware engine also could play traditional chess and also
>>Shuffle Chess. Thus there is a hierarchy of compatibility, where Chess960
>>is top and Shuffle Chess is bottom.
>
>I am not sure what you are trying to say here, or how it contradicts anythig
>I said.  I said that shuffle chess and FRC are slightly different games, and
>as far as I can see you say exactly the same, and proceed to add a few
>obvious remarks about how the two games relate from a chess engine's
>point of view.
>
>FRC and shuffle chess are two different supersets of normal chess.  Arguing
>about whether one of them is "better" than the other is as pointless as
>arguing about whether blondes are prettier than brunettes.

Shuffle Chess is no superset to traditional chess, because it does not support
castlings. Thus traditional chess is not a member of Shuffle Chess, but instead
it belongs to Chess960. Because of those facts the experiences got from Chess960
have a high relevance also for traditional chess. That is in contrast not true
with Shuffle Chess.

Reinhard.

>>Chess960 is not merely some new chess variant.
>
>How do you define a chess variant?  FRC and chess are obviously not the
>same game.  A game is defined by a set of rules, and the rules of FRC are
>clearly different from the rules of chess.  On the other hand, it is obvious
>that FRC is very closely related to chess.  A more clear-cut and obvious
>example of a chess variant is hard to find, IMHO.
>
>Tord



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.