Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: the quality of different ope opening books

Author: Djordje Vidanovic

Date: 03:53:35 03/04/06

Go up one level in this thread


On March 04, 2006 at 01:27:50, Marc Lacrosse wrote:

>On March 03, 2006 at 17:49:42, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:
>
>>On March 03, 2006 at 16:34:46, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote:
>>
>>>I am looking to use the highest quality engine book as one reference in
>>>developing my oponing repertoire (e.g, to help be avoid lines that get ? or ?1)
>>>
>>>What opening book do you recommend. i have chessbase and arena gui.
>>>
>>>At the moment, i have been using fritz9 book. It seems solid.
>>
>>
>>My suggestion is the Noomen book for Rybka in Chessbase format.  It should be a
>>very good reference tool for your purposes.
>>
>>Djordje
>
>I cannot agree Djordje.
>
>Jeroen's book is certainly a very good book for most engines and particularly
>for Rybka performing optimally.
>
>But it is not a good book for a player who intends to build its own repertoire :
>it s much to clearly oriented toward avoiding all the openings that most
>computers do play badly (and this is not surprising as it is built from 90%
>computer games).
>
>Just have a look and you see that Rybka will _never_ play any kind of Benoni,
>East-indian, Benko or Pirc opening with this book: there are whole good famed
>opening systems that are systematically avoided.
>
>For a player intending to broaden his own repertoire, best solutions are either
>building his own ctg book from good players games or buying a product that has
>been built this way (like chessbase Powerbooks).
>
>Marc


Hi Marc,

generally speaking you have a point.  It would be nice to have all the openings
you mentioned there in the book.  However, Rybka.ctg *is* a particular opening
repertoire and could serve as a starting point for creating one.

Any player who wishes to get better and have more success is highly likely to
restrict his choice of opening moves;  I, for one, would never actually play the
Benoni as black nor would I care much about the Pirc.  That's what Jerone did
with the Rybka book -- he simply made a sort of choice based on how he thought
Rybka would play.

I am not saying that his book is perfect -- far from it.  Nevertheless, I am
stressing the point that his book, being 'le dernier cri' in book production,
could possibley server as a starting point.;

Still, let me say it again, speaking from a general viewpoint, your objection
does make sense.

regards,

Djordje



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.