Author: walt irvin
Date: 06:43:31 03/04/06
there has been a huge effert in making chess engines great at search rybka,shredder,fritz,hiarcs ect ect,,,,,how much effert has there been on a good learning feature????? i maintain a chess program should not have to analyze the same position x2 once the position has a history,,,,,as a very radical example think of this some one writes a chess program and calls it darwin ,,the way it makes its move is first it checks its position database if the position is there it makes the next winning move or drawing move otherwise it makes a legal move at randome,,,,,then you play this thing auto vs all the best programs with various books 50,000 games,,,, if nothing else he would remember every single position and the exact move to make from all those games and would now play the moves those programs played ,,,,,,so now u would have a program with no evaluation what so ever competing on a equal bases vs the best programs imagine if that program that learned like that were shredder or fritz ???????????? just a thought that learning has not been developed like searches have,,,,,,,,, walter irvin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.