Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:40:19 03/05/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2006 at 02:57:30, Howard Exner wrote: >On March 04, 2006 at 14:27:38, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I changed the title because it is totally unclear if Qe3 is drawing the game. >> >>1...Qe3 2.Qxd6 Re8 3.Qd7+ Re7 4.Qc6 gives white excellent practical chances to >>win the game(maybe black can save it and maybe not see the long line when of >>course black blundered by going to lost pawn endgame but the position of black >>was bad in any case) > >Thanks for the analysis. White still has some pressure with the lines you give. Yes It seems that 5...Qb1+ by vincent may be a better alternative for black. I did not do a serious analysis of it and I have not time for it because my computer is busy in analysis of my correspondence games. I hope somebody does serious analysis of 5...Qb1+ to find if white has some improvement of the lines that are given by vincent. Uri > >Kasparov typically gives in depth analysis of his games. I wonder if he ever >offered further insight into this game? I just remember reading that his team >reluctantly told him about Qe3 in a restaurant later that evening and he >replayed the variation in his head. >> >>[Event "?"] >>[Site "?"] >>[Date "????.??.??"] >>[Round "?"] >>[White "New game"] >>[Black "?"] >>[Result "*"] >>[SetUp "1"] >>[FEN "1r6/5kp1/RqQb1p1p/1p1PpP2/1Pp1B3/2P4P/6P1/5K2 b - - 0 1"] >>[PlyCount "7"] >> >>1... Qe3 2. Qxd6 Re8 3. h4 (3. Qd7+ Re7) (3. Qc7+ Re7 4. Qc6 Qxe4 (4... Qf4+ 5. >>Bf3 Qc1+ 6. Kf2 Qd2+ 7. Kg1 Qc1+ 8. Kh2 Qf4+ 9. g3 Qxf3 10. d6) 5. d6 Qd3+ 6. >>Kg1 Re8 7. Ra1 Qxc3 8. Rd1 Qc2 (8... Qb3 9. Rf1 Qe3+ 10. Kh2 Qd2 11. Rf3) 9. >>Rf1 Qd2 10. Rf3 Qd4+ 11. Kh2 Qa7 12. Rg3 Rd8 13. Qxb5 Kf8 14. Qxc4 Qd7 15. Qc7 >>e4 16. b5 Ke8 17. Qc4 Qxd6 18. Qg8+ Qf8 19. Rxg7 Qxg8 20. Rxg8+ Ke7 21. Rxd8 >>Kxd8) 3... h5 4. Bf3 Qc1+ * >> >> >> >>Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.