Author: Kirill Kryukov
Date: 02:57:42 03/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Eduard, On March 06, 2006 at 03:30:31, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >Thanks for testing Sarah! > >Question: Why is Hiarcs 10 hypermodern on place 4 and Toga II 1.1a only on >place 5? > >See here: > >4 Hiarcs 10 Hypermodern 2832 +27 −27 55.4% 2799.3 41.8% 400 >5 Toga II 1.1a 2832 +24 −24 55.4% 2797.2 36.9% 558 Toga II 1.1a has rank 5 in our list (I guess you refer to the "All versions" list here), and Hiarcs 10 Hypermodern has no any rank, because its brother Hiarcs 10 (default) performed slightly better. So there is no "4" next to Hypermodern, it simply has no rank, so you compare it with the others by rating only. >1. Toga played more games. >2. the score difference by Toga is only +24 -24, by Hiarcs 10 +27 -27, also >weaker then Toga! You can't use this logic to say that one engine is stronger than the other. Even if one engine has intervals +10 -10 and the other +100 -100, you can't say the first one is stronger if they have the same estimated rating. With more testing it may turn out stronger or weaker, there is no way to know. >I my eyes Toga 1.1a should be now on place 4. Where I am wrong? "Hiarcs 10" (default) has rank 4. Toga 1.1a has lower rating so its rank is 5. Best, Kirill
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.