Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 04:01:27 03/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2006 at 05:57:42, Kirill Kryukov wrote: >Hi Eduard, > >On March 06, 2006 at 03:30:31, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>Thanks for testing Sarah! >> >>Question: Why is Hiarcs 10 hypermodern on place 4 and Toga II 1.1a only on >>place 5? >> >>See here: >> >>4 Hiarcs 10 Hypermodern 2832 +27 −27 55.4% 2799.3 41.8% 400 >>5 Toga II 1.1a 2832 +24 −24 55.4% 2797.2 36.9% 558 > >Toga II 1.1a has rank 5 in our list (I guess you refer to the "All versions" >list here), and Hiarcs 10 Hypermodern has no any rank, because its brother >Hiarcs 10 (default) performed slightly better. So there is no "4" next to >Hypermodern, it simply has no rank, so you compare it with the others by rating >only. > > >>1. Toga played more games. >>2. the score difference by Toga is only +24 -24, by Hiarcs 10 +27 -27, also >>weaker then Toga! > >You can't use this logic to say that one engine is stronger than the other. Even >if one engine has intervals +10 -10 and the other +100 -100, you can't say the >first one is stronger if they have the same estimated rating. With more testing >it may turn out stronger or weaker, there is no way to know. > > >>I my eyes Toga 1.1a should be now on place 4. Where I am wrong? > >"Hiarcs 10" (default) has rank 4. Toga 1.1a has lower rating so its rank is 5. > > >Best, >Kirill OK, I understand now. Thanks, ED.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.