Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:04:05 03/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2006 at 10:04:33, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On March 05, 2006 at 08:40:19, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On March 05, 2006 at 02:57:30, Howard Exner wrote: >> >>>On March 04, 2006 at 14:27:38, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>I changed the title because it is totally unclear if Qe3 is drawing the game. >>>> >>>>1...Qe3 2.Qxd6 Re8 3.Qd7+ Re7 4.Qc6 gives white excellent practical chances to >>>>win the game(maybe black can save it and maybe not see the long line when of >>>>course black blundered by going to lost pawn endgame but the position of black >>>>was bad in any case) >>> >>>Thanks for the analysis. White still has some pressure with the lines you give. >> >>Yes >> >>It seems that 5...Qb1+ by vincent may be a better alternative for black. >> >>I did not do a serious analysis of it and I have not time for it because my >>computer is busy in analysis of my correspondence games. >> >>I hope somebody does serious analysis of 5...Qb1+ to find if white has some >>improvement of the lines that are given by vincent. >> >>Uri > >Note that 5... Qxf5+ 6. Kg1 Rd7 or 5... Qb1+ 6. Kf2 Qxf5+ 7. Kg1 Rd7 give the >same position I analyzed only 5...Qd3+ in my lines so the comparison was between Qd3+ and Qb1+ and not between 5...Qv1+ and 5...Qxf5+ My computer is busy in other positions and I had no time to do serious analysis. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.