Author: James T. Walker
Date: 18:28:01 03/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2006 at 19:33:23, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 06, 2006 at 19:29:08, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On March 06, 2006 at 15:11:25, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On March 06, 2006 at 09:22:11, James T. Walker wrote: >>> >>>>On March 06, 2006 at 07:54:51, Lin Harper wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 06, 2006 at 07:01:17, walt irvin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>since ssdf has been rating computer chess,,,,, i wonder what has been the >>>>>>greatest gap between #1 and #2 on the list??????? >>>>>> >>>>>>walter irvin >>>>> I know what you are alluding to... the upcoming gap between Rybka 64bit and >>>>>whatever is number 2 in some months time. I have'nt been following the SSDF all >>>>>along, but I think Deep Shredder only ever had about a dozen or less points >>>>>between itself and the second place getter. >>>>> regards >>>>> Lin >>>> >>>>I think the SSDF does not have 64bit machines >>> >>>64 bit machines is not enough. They must also have installed a 64 bit operating >>>system, and the programs must be compiled with a 64 bit compiler for that OS. >> >>I think just not having a 64 bit machine is enough to discourage it's use. > >I think that most of the posters here probably have 64 bit machines (or at least >access to one), but very few of them will have a 64 bit OS. > >Any of the AMD 64 bit CPUs or the INTEL EMT CPUs or the Mac or even those Xbox >machines are using 64 bit CPUs. > >But not many run 64 bit Windows or even SUSE Linux 64, etc. The posters here are not the issue. It's about SSDF.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.