Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 20:31:32 03/06/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2006 at 21:28:01, James T. Walker wrote: >On March 06, 2006 at 19:33:23, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On March 06, 2006 at 19:29:08, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On March 06, 2006 at 15:11:25, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On March 06, 2006 at 09:22:11, James T. Walker wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 06, 2006 at 07:54:51, Lin Harper wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On March 06, 2006 at 07:01:17, walt irvin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>since ssdf has been rating computer chess,,,,, i wonder what has been the >>>>>>>greatest gap between #1 and #2 on the list??????? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>walter irvin >>>>>> I know what you are alluding to... the upcoming gap between Rybka 64bit and >>>>>>whatever is number 2 in some months time. I have'nt been following the SSDF all >>>>>>along, but I think Deep Shredder only ever had about a dozen or less points >>>>>>between itself and the second place getter. >>>>>> regards >>>>>> Lin >>>>> >>>>>I think the SSDF does not have 64bit machines >>>> >>>>64 bit machines is not enough. They must also have installed a 64 bit operating >>>>system, and the programs must be compiled with a 64 bit compiler for that OS. >>> >>>I think just not having a 64 bit machine is enough to discourage it's use. >> >>I think that most of the posters here probably have 64 bit machines (or at least >>access to one), but very few of them will have a 64 bit OS. >> >>Any of the AMD 64 bit CPUs or the INTEL EMT CPUs or the Mac or even those Xbox >>machines are using 64 bit CPUs. >> >>But not many run 64 bit Windows or even SUSE Linux 64, etc. > >The posters here are not the issue. It's about SSDF. Yes, of course you are correct. None of the [current] SSDF platforms is 64 bits.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.