Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 20:03:59 03/07/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 07, 2006 at 13:11:28, Bo Persson wrote: >On March 07, 2006 at 05:23:38, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: > >>On March 06, 2006 at 22:16:42, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >> >>>Go with C. >>> >>>I would not recommend JAVA, C++, or any of the OOPS languages. > >>Can u tell me why not C++ please? > >No reason at all. :-) > >Some people believe that when using C++, you must also be an OOP fundamentalist, > using only dynamic variables and virtual functions for everything. Don't do >that! > >If used pragmatically, C++ code is at least as fast as C. Thank you very much, i understand that OOP wont be that fast but as I know C++ is much more simpler for me and ur comments give me extra encouragement to use it. Regards Vikrant > > >Bo Persson > > >> >>> >>>You need something with speed and that doesn't obfuscate and >>>confuse, for computer chess. >>> > >Right!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.