Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:01:19 03/08/06
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2006 at 21:43:00, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On March 08, 2006 at 15:28:04, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On March 08, 2006 at 11:18:19, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >> >>>On March 08, 2006 at 05:59:07, Evgenii Manev wrote: >>> >>>>On March 07, 2006 at 20:29:24, George Speight wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>I think i should add here that Vas has told me that he thinks Peter, Graham and >>>>>Hyatt are all good moderators and he has no problem with any of them. I can say >>>>>with honesty that in all our mails back and forth he has NOT MADE ONE >>>>>derogatory comment about anyone. He seems to be quick to look for the good in >>>>>people first. A mark of character to me. He reminds me a lot of Graham in that >>>>>respect. Regards, George >>>> >>>>hi all >>>> >>>>it seems (I can state it from posts here in CCC - I ain't commercail Rybka user) >>>>that Vasik is nice person. In the other hand, moderators do their hard job >>>>properly. So -- I can't see any problem here? >>>> >>>>(just my 2cents - banning Rolf just because of other member's complaining >>>>against his manner of thinking was not so nessessarily, but - that's completely >>>>other story:) ) >>>> >>>>Best regards, >>>>Geno >>> >>>I read the responses this morning in LA 8:00 AM. One particuliar post was >>>deleted at least I could not find it the next day. If it was not deleted then >>>what happenedl to it. I was very careful in scanning thru. Does not change the >>>main feeling I have here that Vas is treated poorly here. Their have been >>>complaints about his posting now for at least a month. I have had my say, thank >>>you. >>>Wayne >> >> >>I think that if you would look back, read carefully, and give some thought to >>what has happened, you might find that your statement "vas was treated poorly >>here. .... complaints about his posting now for at least a month..." Is >>simply _wrong_. >> >>Vas has _never_ been "the problem" here. Posts about Rybka _have_ been a >>problem, have caused lots of complaints, and have saturated this message board >>with one topic, when such could be much better done on a dedicated to Rybka web >>site instead. >> >>The complaints have been about the rather ridiculous number of Rybka posts that >>happen to pop up, particularly about topics that are not "computer chess" at >>all. For example, the inability to order something from a free email account. >>Or beta test results. Etc. >> >>I get the idea that you don't think much of the current group of moderators, >>which is fine. However, we were elected to do a task for the majority of >>members, and we try to do what the members seem to want done. If a minority >>want to leave because of that, that's how democracy works. > >Darn, I promised myself that I was done with this. But your suggestion that I >leave this forum really makes me mad Bob >Wayne And how do you think false accusations about deleting posts right and left makes _us_ feel? I'm happy to deal with people that have questions about computer chess topics. I can _completely_ do without false accusations...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.