Author: blass uri
Date: 09:23:40 04/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 21, 1999 at 12:08:03, blass uri wrote: > >On April 21, 1999 at 10:09:52, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On April 21, 1999 at 09:48:43, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On April 21, 1999 at 09:15:56, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>>>I think that crafty16.6 may be the best program against humans and programs. >>> >>>>>MAYBE. Crafty made a big step forward! >>> >>>>>>It won 2.5:.5 against Rebel10C in 1 hour per move games and ed told us in the >>>>>>rebelboard that it had a won position in the 4rd game that was lost. >>>>> >>>>>You can't convince me with 2.5-1.5 results or so, give me more. >>>> >>>>It is probably 3.5:.5 because ed said that crafty was winning the 4th game. >>>>It is not a clear proof but I have not more games of crafty at slow time >>>>control. >>> >>>Even if it would go on that way it would only be proof that Crafty beats Rebel. >>>There would still remain the question how Crafty does against other opponents. >>> >>>>Ed will continue the games after WCCC and we will see. >>>>Uri >>> >>>It will take MUCH time... >>>A better Crafty auto232 support would result in more games to have a better >>>impression. >>>BTW are there any recommandations for an opening book for Crafty engine in >>>Fritz-GUI? The Fritz powerbook? >>> >>>And BTW choose your opponent for the Deep Thought-position, you didn't answer >>>yet. I'll try WChess and MCP as black, you choose the white player. >>>Genius or your favourite Junior? :-) >> >>I prefer Junior at long time control because Genius is a root processor and can >>changes it's evaluation after actions like trading queens. >> >>I think that in this tactical position it is better to play the first 10 moves >>at slower time control (at least 10 minutes per move) because it is important >>not to miss something tactical. >> >>I can tell you Junior5.4's and Genius3's moves with white at slow time >>control(at least 10 minutes per move. >> >>Junior follow the game and play a different move only when it choose Kd1 or Kf1 >>instead of Kd2 when Genius3 choose 17.Ne4 Nf5 18.Nfg5 Bxc5 19.Qg4 > >I think that in this line after 19...Qe5 white can rsign > >Junior5.4 shows 3.62 pawns advantage for black after the moves 19.Qg4 Qe5 > >Genius3 failed low at depth 9 in move 19 (the evaluation at depth 8 was -0.15 >with the line Qg4 Qe5 Rb1 h6 Bb2 Bd4 Bxd4 Nxd4) > >The main line of Junior5.4 after the moves Qg4 Qe5 is Rb1 h6 Qxf4 Bxf4 hxg5 Rb8 >Rab8 Bxb8 Rxe4+ Kd1 Ne3+ Kd2 Nxd5 Bxd5 Rd4+ Kc3 Rxd5 Genius3 showed at depth 9 -2.21 evaluation with the line Qg4 Qe5 Rb1 h6 Bb2 Bd4 Bxd4 Nxd4 It is clear that genius3 is not the right opponent to defend this position. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.