Author: James Robertson
Date: 11:27:49 04/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 1999 at 14:04:06, Chris Carson wrote: >On April 22, 1999 at 13:51:52, James Robertson wrote: > >>On April 22, 1999 at 13:33:18, Chris Carson wrote: >> >>>Who is number 1? >>> >>>Fritz beat Deep Blue in the last WCCC. >>>Kasparov beat Karpov and Anand for World Chess Champion Titles. >>>Deep Blue II beat Kasparov in the last match, but Deep Blue II >>>has not beat Fritz in a public match (private match perhaps, but >>>who can say, where are the games?). Kasparov used Fritz as a >>>sparing partner in preparation for the DBII match (where are the >>>games? who won these games? no facts). >>> >>>Deep Blue II ducks the current WCCC. Well I guess we will never have >>>an answer based on facts. So who is number 1 in your opinion? >>> >>>Fritz, DBII, Kasparov, or winner of 1999 WCCC? >>> >>>It will be easy to pick DBII becaus of blah, blah, blah or Kasparov >>>for the same reasons (perhaps valid), but my opinion is that Fritz >>>is the champ until some program (or person) knocks it off the top >>>based on a public match. I like CM6K myself, but it can not be champ >>>if it does not compete. In my opinion. >>> >>>Best Regards, >>>Chris Carson >> >>IMO, this logic is screwy. >> >>James > >Yes, the logic is screwy. That is my point. Why are the top >programs and GM's not playing each other to settle this? Probably because the GMs have everything to lose, and nothing to gain. They will still make money from playing just human tournaments.... > >True, the GM's do have tournaments, but we argue over who is the >best and how good are the programs. Tournaments would solve the >issue and generate a lot more interest (outside of this >news group that is). Just my opinion. I agree; this makes sense. :) James > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.