Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:36:44 04/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 1999 at 14:27:31, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On April 28, 1999 at 13:24:40, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On April 27, 1999 at 23:27:23, Claudio Duarte wrote: >>> >>> A few days ago I saw a discussion about a good program for analysis, >>> and it seems that Crafty on a Fritz 5.32 platform emerged as a good >>> choice. And I had just ordered Hiarcs 6.0 engine for the same purpose. >>> How does it compare to Crafty? Does its positional knowledge trans- >>> lates into good analysis? >>The Hiarcs engine is truly excellent at analysis. We use it in the C.A.P. >>project. It also helps us fill a problem caused by crafty not analyzing epd >>positions which are singular and forced. Highly recommended. > >Crafty is probably checking to see that it has only one legal move, and >preventing the search if that is the case. Wouldn't it be easy enough to simply >remove the test? Probably, but I might break something. I would need to do a full regression test of some kind for a change of that nature. Which means I would have to write a full test plan, etc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.