Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 19:46:53 04/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 1999 at 14:36:44, Dann Corbit wrote: >On April 28, 1999 at 14:27:31, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On April 28, 1999 at 13:24:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On April 27, 1999 at 23:27:23, Claudio Duarte wrote: >>>> >>>> A few days ago I saw a discussion about a good program for analysis, >>>> and it seems that Crafty on a Fritz 5.32 platform emerged as a good >>>> choice. And I had just ordered Hiarcs 6.0 engine for the same purpose. >>>> How does it compare to Crafty? Does its positional knowledge trans- >>>> lates into good analysis? >>>The Hiarcs engine is truly excellent at analysis. We use it in the C.A.P. >>>project. It also helps us fill a problem caused by crafty not analyzing epd >>>positions which are singular and forced. Highly recommended. >> >>Crafty is probably checking to see that it has only one legal move, and >>preventing the search if that is the case. Wouldn't it be easy enough to simply >>remove the test? >Probably, but I might break something. I would need to do a full regression >test of some kind for a change of that nature. Which means I would have to write >a full test plan, etc. Hmm. You could ask Bob to add an option!? It could then be tested with whatever testing he normally does. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.