Author: blass uri
Date: 08:50:07 04/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 1999 at 09:08:17, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On April 29, 1999 at 08:42:24, blass uri wrote: > >>Most of the games of the ssdf are not public and we have no way to check if they >>really happened. >> > >I cannot fully understand the motivation for this project. >Obviously, you distrust the SSDF. I am influenced by the fact that I do not like the results of Junior5. I found that the results based on public games of Junior5 are better. I could not find the games of the matches when Junior5 lost (especially the match against Hiarcs7 28.5:11.5). I want to see the games to find Junior's problems. I know that Junior5 is not close to be perfect and I do not complain when Junior5 is losing in public games. It lost against Chessmaster6000 7.5:4.5 in James walker's games and I try to give Amir Ban ideas how to improve his program by looking at these games. I cannot do it when the games are not public. If this is the case, then why you trust in the >published games. These could be manipulated very well, though each of them being >reproducable. E.g. they would just have to skip some games with unwanted >results. I agree that they can manipulate by giving only part of the games but at least lazy cheaters who do not play games between programs cannot cheat. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.