Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 09:10:25 04/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 1999 at 22:46:53, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On April 28, 1999 at 14:36:44, Dann Corbit wrote: >>On April 28, 1999 at 14:27:31, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>>On April 28, 1999 at 13:24:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>>On April 27, 1999 at 23:27:23, Claudio Duarte wrote: >>>>> >>>>> A few days ago I saw a discussion about a good program for analysis, >>>>> and it seems that Crafty on a Fritz 5.32 platform emerged as a good >>>>> choice. And I had just ordered Hiarcs 6.0 engine for the same purpose. >>>>> How does it compare to Crafty? Does its positional knowledge trans- >>>>> lates into good analysis? >>>>The Hiarcs engine is truly excellent at analysis. We use it in the C.A.P. >>>>project. It also helps us fill a problem caused by crafty not analyzing epd >>>>positions which are singular and forced. Highly recommended. >>> >>>Crafty is probably checking to see that it has only one legal move, and >>>preventing the search if that is the case. Wouldn't it be easy enough to simply >>>remove the test? >>Probably, but I might break something. I would need to do a full regression >>test of some kind for a change of that nature. Which means I would have to write >>a full test plan, etc. > >Hmm. You could ask Bob to add an option!? It could then be tested with >whatever testing he normally does. I have asked for this feature. I may ask again.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.