Author: blass uri
Date: 05:57:53 04/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 1999 at 03:35:59, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On April 29, 1999 at 17:41:12, Roger D Davis wrote: > >>If the results of the SSDF are claimed to be OBJECTIVE, then what is wrong with >>making all the games public? The fact that some of the games are not public is >>bound to draw suspicion. And it should. What does the SSDF gain by keeping >>certain games private? Nothing that I can think of. The SSDF is not a commercial >>entity, right? Then why keep some of the games private? > >You should take into account that they have been testing for a lot of years now; >in the beginning with chess computers only, which would not support automatic >storage of game notations. Furthermore, the PGN standard wasn't (well) known >those days. So, I simply guess that they only have a fraction of the games, >nicely stored on disk in PGN format. If this is the reason then I do not understand the reason that most of the games of Junior5 are not public. I am interested mainly in the games of Junior5 against pentium200MMX programs. Only games against Nimzo98 are public when the matches:Junior5-Fritz5,Junior5-Hiarcs7,Junior5-Rebel9,Junior5-Mchesspro are not public Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.