Author: James Robertson
Date: 22:24:54 04/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 01, 1999 at 00:58:52, James B. Shearer wrote: >On April 30, 1999 at 21:13:22, James Robertson wrote: > >>I have heard that the games were game in 60 and game 30, and Fritz won >>convincingly 5.5 - 2.5. But I have a question; what was the distrobution of the >>draws and wins over the time controls? >> >>On the official webpage they have this: >> >> >> ápr. 27. ápr. 28. ápr. 29. ápr. 30. >>Polgár--Fritz >>14oo-16oo 0.5--0.5 0.5--0.5 0--1 1--0 >>Fritz--Polgár >>16oo-17oo 0.5--0.5 1--0 1--0 1--0 >> >>I may be misreading this but: the upper row is the scores for game in 60 >>(because two hours of time was allocated), and the lower row game in 30 (because >>only one hour was allocated). >> >>If this is the case, then Polgar actually drew Fritz at game in 60! >>Which means that Polgar lost .5 - 3.5 at game in 30. >> >>Now then if Polgar loses .5 - 3.5 at G/30, and in double the amount of time, >>G/60, she draws 2 - 2, then the simplest logic tells us that in double G/60, or >>40/2 tournament time) then Polgar will defeat Fritz 3.5 - .5!!! >> >>James > > Well she had white in the top row and black in the bottom row which might >have something to do with it. Actually this seems strange if the time controls >were really different. Does anyone know for sure what the conditions were? > Also why did fritz resign the game it lost? I didn't see an obvious >crusher for Polgar. > James B. Shearer I couldn't figure out the color thing either. She had white in two draws and in one win. It doesn't make sense to give her white in the four longer games and Black in the shorter ones.... maybe someone has more information? However, for game 7, Polgar did have a win. Why Fritz resigned so soon I don't know, but things would have gotten worse fast. James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.