Author: allan johnson
Date: 22:50:29 04/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 01, 1999 at 01:11:57, James Robertson wrote: >On May 01, 1999 at 01:07:34, eric guttenberg wrote: > >>It is a telling commentary on the continually growing accomplishments of >>the top chess computer programs that one of the top ranked grandmasters in >>the world can lose a match to one such program by 5.5-2.5 and have >>somebody hail it as a great victory for the human player. >> >>eric > >You missed the point of my post completely. :( > >James James If you saying that because Polgar won a couple of battles in the tactics department that computers may not be as strong in that area as lots of people are suggessting then what are the strengths of the computer that enable it to clock up a 5.5-2.5 scoreline?Time pressure on the human,superior positionalplay,mistakes made by the human? I'd be interested to read yours and other people's opinions. Rabbits
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.