Author: blass uri
Date: 02:35:47 05/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 1999 at 18:15:30, Chuck wrote: >On April 30, 1999 at 17:14:36, odell hall wrote: > >> >>On April 30, 1999 at 15:54:40, KarinsDad wrote: >> >>>On April 30, 1999 at 15:31:47, odell hall wrote: >>> >>Oh I forgot to mention the outstanding Perforances of computers at the Aegon >>tournament With Mchess and Rebel with performances ratings over 2600el0. >>No doubt I am leaving alot out!! When you have all these results and people are >>still having doubts, this makes me wonder what people are looking for. yet a >>human only has to score three norms to be considered a GM. No doubt had all the above events been Qualified by Fide as Norms, Computers would have earned the title long ago. Could you show me a human international master that could >>achieve any of the above? I ask you again, if this is not suffient evidence >>than what would be? Does programs have to Grow wings and then Fly to Heaven >and Beat God? Perhaps then you would still say there is no evidence! > >I would not consider the Aegon tourneys any evidence of GM strength whatsoever. >This is due to the fact that alot of the human opponents were less than IM >strength. I think any 2500-rated player could easily achieve a 2600+ Tournament >Performance Rating if most of his opponents are 2200-2400 rated. I do not agree about it. Do you have a proof that the performance of 2500 rated players against 2200-2400 players is 2600+? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.