Author: pete
Date: 02:07:20 05/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
<snip> > >Should the makers of these various Winboard engines start arguing that they can >hang (and in this case beat) the commericals and start charging $50 for their >engines, since they're better than Nimzo? Should I start analyzing my games with >various Winboard engines instead of Nimzo2000? > >Roger <snip> I agree the best freeware programs are not much worse than the commercial ones. But the NIMZO case is special : actually there is a version nimzo2000a which plays just as good as the original Nimzo2000, which is a very strong program while the sold winboard engine just sucks ( for example varduz on ICC uses 2000a ). I think probably the author is planning to make an internet connection for the original program himself . What over reason is possible to offer something that is worse than your best ? Or maybe he wanted to fool millenium :=) Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.