Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: I am not sure if hxg5 and maybe black cannot sve the position.

Author: Francis Monkman

Date: 07:10:10 05/02/99

Go up one level in this thread

On May 02, 1999 at 09:04:43, blass uri wrote:


>21.Nxh5 is also good in this line and Junior suggests  Rad8 because in this
>position it can see that 21...gxh5 is leading to mate against black.
>
>I think that you need to see more than 9,10,11 plies to see that 21.Nxh5 gxh5 is
>losing to Qd2
>For example
>21.Nxh5 gxh5 22.Qd2 Rfc8 23.Qh6 Bf8 24.Qg5+ Kh7 25.Qxh5+ Kg8 26.Ng5 Bc5 27.Qh7+
>Kf8 28.Qh8# is a 15 ply line and black has material advantage before the mate.

Try not 22 Qd2 but 22 Ng5! and Black loses immediately. That's 9 plies from the
'start'. What I'm saying is that after 9 plies played, most (strong) programs
register a huge disadvantage for Black, so why don't they find it in a 9-ply
search?

Francis

• Re: I am not sure if hxg5 and maybe black cannot sve the position. blass uri 08:04:24 05/02/99
  • Re: I am not sure if hxg5 and maybe black cannot sve the position. Francis Monkman 08:43:27 05/02/99
    • Re: we need more than 9 plies to prove that black is losing . blass uri 09:30:41 05/02/99
      • Re: we need more than 9 plies to prove that black is losing . Francis Monkman 10:17:50 05/02/99
        • Re: we need more than 9 plies to prove that black is losing . Dann Corbit 16:09:23 05/03/99

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.