Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: I am not sure if hxg5 and maybe black cannot sve the position.

Author: Francis Monkman

Date: 08:43:27 05/02/99

Go up one level in this thread

On May 02, 1999 at 11:04:24, blass uri wrote:

>
>On May 02, 1999 at 10:10:10, Francis Monkman wrote:
>
>
>>Try not 22 Qd2 but 22 Ng5! and Black loses immediately. That's 9 plies from the
>>'start'. What I'm saying is that after 9 plies played, most (strong) programs
>>register a huge disadvantage for Black, so why don't they find it in a 9-ply
>>search?
>>
>>Francis
>
>You are right that 22.Ng5 is shorter but it is still not 9 ply from the
>start(from the 18.f5 move).

Sorry, but 18w-1, 18b-2, 19w-3, 19b-4, 20-w-5, 20b-6, 21w-7, 21b-8, 22w-9,
9-plies

Francis

• Re: we need more than 9 plies to prove that black is losing . blass uri 09:30:41 05/02/99
  • Re: we need more than 9 plies to prove that black is losing . Francis Monkman 10:17:50 05/02/99
    • Re: we need more than 9 plies to prove that black is losing . Dann Corbit 16:09:23 05/03/99

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.