Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: we need more than 9 plies to prove that black is losing .

Author: blass uri

Date: 09:30:41 05/02/99

Go up one level in this thread



On May 02, 1999 at 11:43:27, Francis Monkman wrote:

>
>On May 02, 1999 at 11:04:24, blass uri wrote:
>
>>
>>On May 02, 1999 at 10:10:10, Francis Monkman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Try not 22 Qd2 but 22 Ng5! and Black loses immediately. That's 9 plies from the
>>>'start'. What I'm saying is that after 9 plies played, most (strong) programs
>>>register a huge disadvantage for Black, so why don't they find it in a 9-ply
>>>search?
>>>
>>>Francis
>>
>>You are right that 22.Ng5 is shorter but it is still not 9 ply from the
>>start(from the 18.f5 move).
>
>Sorry, but 18w-1, 18b-2, 19w-3, 19b-4, 20-w-5, 20b-6, 21w-7, 21b-8, 22w-9,
>9-plies
>
>Francis

Sorry, but the static evaluation of the position after 22.Ng5 is not a win for
white and you need to see some more plies to see that white is winning.

9 plies+ right extensions is enough but programs do not know to do the right
extensions.

Uri

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.