Author: Mark Young
Date: 12:42:47 05/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 1999 at 15:11:16, blass uri wrote: > >On May 02, 1999 at 14:24:11, Mark Young wrote: > >>On May 02, 1999 at 02:10:06, jose hernandez wrote: >> >>> >>>Fritz5.32 ( PII 500 MMX ) - Hiarcs7 ( PII 500 MMX ) >>> >>> >>> d4,d5. c4,e6, Nc3,Nf6. Nf3,Be7. Be5,0-0. e3,h6. Bh4,b6. Be2,Bb7, Bxf6,Bxf6 >>> cxd5,exd5. 0-0,Cbd7. Qb3,c6. Rc1,Re8. Rfd1,Cf8. Qc2,Qe7. Qb1,Rc8. b4,Ne6. >>> Na4,Qd6. Bf1,Ng5 (out of book) Nxg5,Bxg5. a3,g6. Nc3,f5. Bd3,f4. e4,f3. e5, >>> Qe6, Rc2,Qg4. Bf1,fxg2. Bxg2,Rf8. Re2,Rf5, h3,Qh5, Rde1,Rf8. b5,Bh4. Nd1,c5. >>> Qd3,c4. Qc3,Rf4. Rc2,Qf5. Re2,Qf7. a4,Kh7. Ra2,Bc8. Rb2,Bf5. Rd2,Bd3. e6,Qf6. >>> e7,Re8. Re5,Rxe7. Ne3,Rxf2. Nxd5,Rxg2. Rxg2,Qf1+ Kh2,Rxe5. dxe5,Be4. Qd2,Bg5. >>> Qe2,Qxe2. Rxe2,Bxd5. >>> >>> 0 - 1 White resign. >>> >>>Hiarcs7 play a good fine game. In Tournament time controls Hiarcs is very, very >>>strong, >>> >>>Please look all the game , is a fine game , good understand in all the position. >>>Or the opening was bad for fritz5,32 ??????? >>> >>> >>>Please put your opinion, I want to know. >>> >>> >>>Look the match = Fritz5.32 0 1/2 0 >>> Hiarcs 7 1 1/2 1 >>> >>>The match look bad to Fritz5.32. Tomorrow is game Four >>> >>>Thanks......... >> >>so far your results are mirroring mine, I tested Hiarcs7 on a PII 400 vs Fritz >>5.32. Hiarcs7 won easy, It looks like Fritz does not gain as much from faster >>computers (or longer think times) as Hiarcs7 does. Fritz 5.32 may be stronger >>then Hiarcs7 at 40/2 on a P200mmx by a few rating points. On a PII or PIII >>Hiarcs7 is much stronger then Fritz 5.32. CM6000 also gains much from the faster >>chips at 40/2. In my testing Hiarcs7 and CM6000 on PII 450 or PII 400 computers >>are the strongest programs out. > >Did you test Crafty16.6 and other programs at 40/2? I have not tested crafty for a bit, because it has done so poorly in my testing, and other testings I have seen. I have heard good things about Crafty 16.6-.7 it may be time to test again. > >The results of Ed showed that Crafty16.6 at 1 hour per move won Rebel10C >3.5:.5(2.5:.5 in public games and crafty had a winning position in a game that >Ed lost) when Fritz5.32 lost 1.5:.5 against Rebel10C I like Rebel 10c, but it still has some kind of big hole in its tactical evaluation. In a lot of games I have played with it, it will just drop a pawn or miss some kind of tactic that the other programs I am playing against it will see right away after Rebel 10c blunders. It takes a few or more move later before Rebel's eval will take a nose dive, but then its to late. It will do this playing with GM on or off. What is bad about this for Rebel 10 is most of the time it has the better game positional when it blunders. I find it hard to believe that this problem can not be fixed without hurting its positional evaluation or causing other bigger holes. This is the same problem I found with Hiarcs6, but find a lot less in Hiarcs7 and Hiarcs7 is a much better all around program for it, playing humans or other programs. > >I also think that maybe Fritz5.32 is not the strongest Fritz and Fritz5(16 bit) >may be better. I agree with the above, I find that Fritz 5.16 is better. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.