Author: James Robertson
Date: 14:11:51 05/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 1999 at 10:29:49, Francis Monkman wrote: > >On May 01, 1999 at 19:10:59, James Robertson wrote: > >>Today I reached this position in a game on FICS: >> >>r1b4r/1p1pk1pp/p1n1p3/4qp1Q/4B3/2N1P3/PPP3PP/R4RK1 w - - >> >>Declining the sacrifice with 16. ... d5 or 16. ... Kd8 seems best, in which >>case White simply wins a pawn with a slightly worse position. Is there any >>program (none I tried on my machine could do it) that plays 16. Bxf5, or that >>avoids 16. ... exf5? Also, is there a refutation for my sacrifice I might have >>missed? > >How about 16 ...Qxe3+ 17 Kh1 Qh6, this might solve Black's problem. This was >suggested by ChessBase analysis (1994) which allows multiple analysis lines, >a feature I find invaluable. Needless to say this was not its first line (third, >I think) >but it looks like a good solution. > >Francis I think it is worse than Kd8, as Black ends up with doubled rook pawns. James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.