Author: Wayne Lowrance
Date: 16:03:18 05/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 1999 at 15:42:47, Mark Young wrote: >On May 02, 1999 at 15:11:16, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On May 02, 1999 at 14:24:11, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On May 02, 1999 at 02:10:06, jose hernandez wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Fritz5.32 ( PII 500 MMX ) - Hiarcs7 ( PII 500 MMX ) >>>> >>>> >>>> d4,d5. c4,e6, Nc3,Nf6. Nf3,Be7. Be5,0-0. e3,h6. Bh4,b6. Be2,Bb7, Bxf6,Bxf6 >>>> cxd5,exd5. 0-0,Cbd7. Qb3,c6. Rc1,Re8. Rfd1,Cf8. Qc2,Qe7. Qb1,Rc8. b4,Ne6. >>>> Na4,Qd6. Bf1,Ng5 (out of book) Nxg5,Bxg5. a3,g6. Nc3,f5. Bd3,f4. e4,f3. e5, >>>> Qe6, Rc2,Qg4. Bf1,fxg2. Bxg2,Rf8. Re2,Rf5, h3,Qh5, Rde1,Rf8. b5,Bh4. Nd1,c5. >>>> Qd3,c4. Qc3,Rf4. Rc2,Qf5. Re2,Qf7. a4,Kh7. Ra2,Bc8. Rb2,Bf5. Rd2,Bd3. e6,Qf6. >>>> e7,Re8. Re5,Rxe7. Ne3,Rxf2. Nxd5,Rxg2. Rxg2,Qf1+ Kh2,Rxe5. dxe5,Be4. Qd2,Bg5. >>>> Qe2,Qxe2. Rxe2,Bxd5. >>>> >>>> 0 - 1 White resign. >>>> >>>>Hiarcs7 play a good fine game. In Tournament time controls Hiarcs is very, very >>>>strong, >>>> >>>>Please look all the game , is a fine game , good understand in all the position. >>>>Or the opening was bad for fritz5,32 ??????? >>>> >>>> >>>>Please put your opinion, I want to know. >>>> >>>> >>>>Look the match = Fritz5.32 0 1/2 0 >>>> Hiarcs 7 1 1/2 1 >>>> >>>>The match look bad to Fritz5.32. Tomorrow is game Four >>>> >>>>Thanks......... >>> >>>so far your results are mirroring mine, I tested Hiarcs7 on a PII 400 vs Fritz >>>5.32. Hiarcs7 won easy, It looks like Fritz does not gain as much from faster >>>computers (or longer think times) as Hiarcs7 does. Fritz 5.32 may be stronger >>>then Hiarcs7 at 40/2 on a P200mmx by a few rating points. On a PII or PIII >>>Hiarcs7 is much stronger then Fritz 5.32. CM6000 also gains much from the faster >>>chips at 40/2. In my testing Hiarcs7 and CM6000 on PII 450 or PII 400 computers >>>are the strongest programs out. >> >>Did you test Crafty16.6 and other programs at 40/2? > >I have not tested crafty for a bit, because it has done so poorly in my testing, >and other testings I have seen. I have heard good things about Crafty 16.6-.7 it >may be time to test again. >> >>The results of Ed showed that Crafty16.6 at 1 hour per move won Rebel10C >>3.5:.5(2.5:.5 in public games and crafty had a winning position in a game that >>Ed lost) when Fritz5.32 lost 1.5:.5 against Rebel10C > >I like Rebel 10c, but it still has some kind of big hole in its tactical >evaluation. In a lot of games I have played with it, it will just drop a pawn or >miss some kind of tactic that the other programs I am playing against it will >see right away after Rebel 10c blunders. It takes a few or more move later >before Rebel's eval will take a nose dive, but then its to late. It will do this >playing with GM on or off. What is bad about this for Rebel 10 is most of the >time it has the better game positional when it blunders. I find it hard to >believe that this problem can not be fixed without hurting its positional >evaluation or causing other bigger holes. This is the same problem I found with >Hiarcs6, but find a lot less in Hiarcs7 and Hiarcs7 is a much better all around >program for it, playing humans or other programs. > >> >>I also think that maybe Fritz5.32 is not the strongest Fritz and Fritz5(16 bit) >>may be better. > >I agree with the above, I find that Fritz 5.16 is better. >> >>Uri I would be interested in knowing what you guys think about the better program when playing 10/0 games or even shorter down to 1/0 games ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.